>> SPICE Discussion Board (including HSPICE)
Thread views: 26418 View all threadsNext thread*

(Stranger )
01/12/07 06:15 AM
Re: HSIM, NanoSim, UltraSim, ADiT, AuSim... [re: djepayne]Report this article as Inappropriate to us !!!Login to Reply

Hi djepayne,

below the answers according to my experience with NanoSim, HSIM and Mach-TA.

* Big digital design: NanoSim seems to be better than other two.
* all kind of memories: HSIM is absolutely the best one and judging from other people experiences HSIM doesn't have rivals;
* Big D + small A: it depends of design complexity (mostly the complexity of the analog part). In my opinion the best thing is to co-simulate HSIM with NCSim. It's a very robust and stable solution.
* mostly analog: HSIM is the best one and judging from other people experiences, other mature FastSPICE tools aren't at HSIM's level.
* RF: unfortunately I haven't had any experience on RF design.

Taking in consideration various evalutions I saw and the rumors from EDA world:

- Cadence UltraSim is less performant than HSIM on analog & mixed-signal;
- Nascentric doesn't have still a stable, robust and large spectrum product;
- ADiT: is on going the phase of integratin within Mentor ADVance-MS environment. I'll test it.

I hope my answers may help you in the decision.

Ciao, Ivetic

Entire thread
SubjectPosted byPosted on
*HSIM, NanoSim, UltraSim, ADiT, AuSim... djepayne   01/10/07 09:50 PM
.*Re: HSIM, NanoSim, UltraSim, ADiT, AuSim... brano   01/12/07 06:15 AM
.*Re: HSIM, NanoSim, UltraSim, ADiT, AuSim... CirSimGuy   01/11/07 10:27 PM
Jump to


Internet Business Systems © 2017 Internet Business Systems, Inc.
595 Millich Dr., Suite 216, Campbell, CA 95008
+1 (408)-337-6870 — Contact Us, or visit our other sites:
AECCafe - Architectural Design and Engineering TechJobsCafe - Technical Jobs and Resumes GISCafe - Geographical Information Services  MCADCafe - Mechanical Design and Engineering ShareCG - Share Computer Graphic (CG) Animation, 3D Art and 3D Models
  Privacy Policy