February 27, 2006
Please Don't Take My Blackberry Away- RIM Vs NTP
Please note that contributed articles, blog entries, and comments posted on EDACafe.com are the views and opinion of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the management and staff of Internet Business Systems and its subsidiary web-sites.
On February 1, 2006 RIM issued a statement characterizing a recent ruling by the USPTO as “maintaining the outright and complete rejection of all claims in the '592 Patent, which includes five of the seven claims that RIM was ruled to have infringed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in August, 2005. In addition the ruling confirmed that no grounds for patentability of the '592 Patent were found by the Patent Office in the course of its reexamination.” And “In all of the Patent Office rulings to date relating to the reexamination of all eight of the NTP patents, NTP's arguments on the merits of patentability have been rejected by the Patent Office.”
BlackBerry software and system operate) and the workaround will remain dormant. In the event of an injunction, RIM is able to remotely activate “US Mode” via its NOC and the workaround designs would automatically engage for each handset containing the Multi-Mode Edition software update.
According to RIM “Although the development of this modification required substantial R&D effort from RIM and would require software updates in the event of an injunction, RIM has ensured that the industry leading functionality, performance and user experience remains intact." The firm also said that it has received a confidential and privileged legal opinion confirming that RIM's software workaround designs do not infringe any of the NTP patent claims remaining in the litigation.
On February 24th RIM confirmed today that it has received a copy of a Final Office Action issued by Patent Office in the ex parte reexamination of NTP, Inc. Patent #5,436,960. This Final Office Action maintains the outright and complete rejection of all claims in the patent. All of the 3 patents remaining in dispute in the NTP vs. RIM litigation have now been rejected based in part on prior art not considered in the 2002 trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
covered by an injunction.
At the hearing NTP, Inc. asked the judge to award it $126 million in damages and issue an injunction against the maker of the popular BlackBerry wireless e-mail service for violating its patents.
RIM is clearly not an EDA firm. However, it is a significant user of EDA products. It employs 3,555 people. Of this number 1,000 are engineers in its R&D organization focused on areas such as antenna design, RF engineering, industrial design and software engineering. They also have a significant manufacturing operation.
licensing fees rather than challenge what they consider to be improperly granted patents. This acquiescence then gives credence to the patent claims that can be leveraged in subsequent lawsuits.
In this case at one point RIM was willing to pay $450 million, roughly one years revenue at the time, for licensing patented technologies from NTP whose patents RIM considered to invalid. The court was impatient and stated unwillingness to wait until the legitimacy of the patents could be determined even when the USPTO issued non-final positions that the patents would be likely found invalid. Many legal observers were critical of RIM for not settling sooner.
EDA and semiconductor firms are on both sides of this issue. They clearly want strong government protection of their intellectual property which is often their principal asset. They seek Washington influence to get similar protections around the globe notably in China. EDA firms aggressively defend their patent rights in the courts. For example, Magma and Synopsys are currently embroiled in a patent suit. On the other hand it is not in the industry's best interest to have patent firm running around seeking licensing fees for overly broad and likely invalid patents.
In a filing with the Supreme Court, Intel's lawyers said the company is torn. As an investor of billions of dollars into research and development, the company is among the nation's leaders in obtaining patents and wants to protect itself against infringement.
At the same time, Intel also is frequently accused of infringement and wants clearer rules that protect it from small patent-holding companies that have little infrastructure and produce no products.
Regardless of the outcome of the February 24th hearing, the RIM vs NTP will likely drag on in the courts for some time. The resulting legal precedent as well as the length and the cost of the legal battle will greatly influence how firms respond in the future to any similar situation.
The top articles over the last two weeks as determined by the number of readers were
Mentor Graphics Calibre Mask Data Preparation Ready for 45nm Mentor's mask data preparation tool suite, Calibre(R) MDP, has been qualified for production at leading IDMs for the 45 nanometer process technology in flows based on OASIS, the next generation stream format. This insures the IDMs' ability to efficiently manage the large data files needed to create a mask for integrated circuit production. MDP supports all mask writer formats: MEBES, JEOL, Toshiba/NuFlare, Hitachi and Micronic.
VaST's Technical Advisory Board Plans Working Session to Guide VaST's Long-term Technology Development The TAB's charter is to join with VaST in identifying, analyzing and forecasting strategic shifts and trends in technologies, industries and markets and to provide VaST with information and guidance on the medium- and long-term technological and product objectives of the company and their alignment with industry needs. The first TAB meeting was held in Anaheim, California in June 2005
hardware/software co-verification and to dramatically accelerate overall SoC verification and debugging.
Cadence Design System industry-standard analog and mixed-signal design flow. For a limited time, users of competitive tools may receive a credit of up to 100 percent of the purchase price of their current software toward the purchase of select Advanced Design System (ADS) or RF Design Environment (RFDE) products.
You can find the full EDACafe event calendar here.
To read more news, click here.
-- Jack Horgan, EDACafe.com Contributing Editor.
Be the first to review this article