March 28, 2005
State of Basic Research Funding
Please note that contributed articles, blog entries, and comments posted on EDACafe.com are the views and opinion of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the management and staff of Internet Business Systems and its subsidiary web-sites.
The question obviously arises as to what the criteria should be for the expenditure of public funds. National defense, job creation (“pork”) and curing diseases are favorites among politicians. Basic scientific research is more difficult to justify with voters. It lacks a powerful political constituency. Basic research has unknown long term benefits to weigh against other funding proposals with presumed short term predictable benefits or tax cuts. One can certainly argue that basic research has created enormous benefits for society over the long term. Consider where we would be in 2005 without an understanding of electricity and magnetism.
Companies are quire willing to spend money on product development. The big three EDA companies Cadence, Synopsys and Mentor Graphics spent $350 million, $285 million and $202 million respectively on R&D during their last fiscal year. However, it is difficult to explain to the shareholders large expenditures on research that has no identifiable ROI. Further, many areas of research require expenditures beyond the financial means of even the largest companies. Lastly, basic scientific research requires cooperation, information sharing and possible coordination across companies, industries and countries. Only the federal government can insure this.
For more than 40 years, the NASA Commercial Technology Program has facilitated the transfer of NASA technology to the private sectors. The resulting commercialization has contributed to the development of commercial products and services in the fields of health and medicine, industry, consumer goods, computer technology, and environment. On an annual basis NASA issues Spinoff, a publication featuring successfully commercialized NASA technology. Despite these public relation efforts many people believe that the only tangible benefits to the space program were pretty pictures, Tang and Velcro.
The table below shows the Federal budget authority for basic research by budget function over 5 years.
Federally Funded Research Programs
The remainder of this commentary covers some examples of projects that have had and/or will have significant government spending.
There are some well know examples of major government spending research programs. The Manhattan Project was begun at the urging of Albert Einstein and other physicists and led to the Atomic Bomb that ended WW II.
faster end-to-end than today's Internet.
The Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) project was intended to construct a ring particle accelerator near Waxahachie, Texas. The ring was designed to have a circumference of 54 miles and to have sufficient energy to create a Higgs boson, an elementary particle predicted by the Standard Model but not yet detected. The project was estimated to cost $8.5 billion. The project was eventually canceled by Congress in 1993 after 14 miles of tunnel were already dug and 2 billion dollars spent. The argument was that the country could not simultaneously afford the SCC and the International Space Station.
expensive to accomplish.”
, Voyager 1 and 2). In addition a number of satellites were launched into orbit: Landsat for environmental monitoring and Echo 1, TIROS, and Telstar for communications and weather monitoring.
The program to achieve Kennedy's goal cost $25.4 billion over the life of the program. Only the building of the Panama Canal rivaled the size of the Apollo program as the largest nonmilitary technological endeavor ever undertaken by the United States.
In 1975, NASA cooperated with the Soviet Union to achieve the first international human spaceflight, the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project.
In 1984, Congress authorized NASA to build a major new space station as a base for further space exploration. Several redesigns took place during the next nine years. Then Russia, which had many years of experience in long-duration human spaceflight, joined the United States and other international partners in 1993 to build a facility that became known as the International Space Station (ISS). The International Space Station draws upon the resources and the scientific and technological expertise of 16 cooperating nations, including the United States, Canada, Japan, Russia and 11 participating member nations of the European Space Agency.
In January 2004 President Bush announced a new vision for the Nation's space exploration program. The President committed the United States to a long-term human and robotic program to explore the solar system, starting with a return to the Moon that will ultimately enable future exploration of Mars and other destinations. The President's plan for steady human and robotic space exploration is based on the following goals:
The U.S. Human Genome Project was a 13-year effort started in 1990 and coordinated by the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Institutes of Health. The project originally was planned to last 15 years, but rapid technological advances accelerated the completion date to 2003. Project goals were to
Another important feature of the project was the federal government's long-standing dedication to the transfer of technology to the private sector. By licensing technologies to private companies and awarding grants for innovative research, the project catalyzed the multibillion-dollar U.S. biotechnology industry and fostered the development of new medical applications.
You can find the full EDACafe event calendar here.
To read more news, click here.
-- Jack Horgan, EDACafe.com Contributing Editor.
Be the first to review this article