September 12, 2005
Who Is Using ESL and Why?
Please note that contributed articles, blog entries, and comments posted on EDACafe.com are the views and opinion of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the management and staff of Internet Business Systems and its subsidiary web-sites.
What are people doing with ESL tools?
because of the nature of the custom logic you put in there.
with software. So it provides the advantages of flexibility. That's why we are seeing more adoption among non-standard hardware people. We are making this custom logic available as a custom coprocessor to design. The numbers we are seeing here are kind of showing that.
What are some of the additional things that are required in order to encourage ESL adoption?
Certainly training, methodology and standards showed up big time as things that needed to be put in place. I think as the industry matures it will do that. The industry also has to recognize that the software people obviously need a different type of training than the hardware people when you allow them to do this type of design. Those are the challenges we face.
Why would people choose ASIC versus FPGA?
people are often able to move the other way because of the costs and still get their performance at this point.
How does the cost of FPGA tool compare to versus ASIC tools.
We still track that because that is important for our business. ASIC people are still spending a lot more money than FPGA guys and that holds true in our survey. We're encouraged to see that a good majority of people are still willing to spend over $25K. If there are 10X more people that are able to use FPGAs even at $10K and above, that represents a huge market for FPGA that we can tap into. It's a new type of market. You have to get your value proposition aligned with what these people are able to pay. It's good news from the survey as well.
Use of embedded cores
The majority of designs are using some form of core inside the embedded system. It doesn't necessarily mean that it is an embedded on-chip core. Most people in the survey use or plan to use some form of embedded core, hard core of soft core.
FPGA, off chip microprocessors and DSPs are still the most popular. The majority of people are using some form of processor in their system which is what we expected to see.
One of the things that surprised us is that we are not seeing too much pickup of other things than FPGAs in terms of reprogrammable fabric. It's still kind of early in the day where somebody can expect to see some form of custom reprogrammable silicon like Elixent, IPFlex or where say Toshiba has a reconfigurable fabric on their device. We are not seeing a whole lot of demand yet for those. Only 8% are using and only 24% are intending to use. So early days for things other than FPGAs as far as reprogrammability is concerned.
That bodes well for the FPGA guys. It means that there a tough road for those people doing reconfigurable fabrics or reconfigurable processors. We are not seeing the adoption there.
Why would someone augment their microprocessor or DSP processor with an FPGA?
We are finding good adoption across the board here. Flexibility and performance are the main issues. People want the capability of getting the best performance they can flexibly across the processor and the hardware. That's why they are augmenting their processors with FPGAs.
Compared to last year's survey what were the most significant changes?
The most significant in terms of what we were looking for was that the adoption of ESL is much greater than it had been. It's shown very good continued growth. The movement towards more algorithmic and systems people using custom logic because they were enabled by ESL. There was also a continued growth pattern. The continuing of the trends si really what we are seeing here.
So extrapolation of prior trends rather than any big changes?
There hasn't been any step function here, no sudden switch. The trend is continuing.
Were there any surprises?
I can't say that there were any real surprises. We were a little surprised to find out that there are more people looking at reconfigurable processors or reconfigurable fabrics that companies have but in the end proprietary solutions are always a tough sale. Those will be proprietary until they get more adoption. I guess that was a bit of a surprise.
The fairly significant dip in planned HDL use was a bit of a surprise over last year. In last year's survey they expect it to basically hold steady. The same people that were using HDL expect to continue to use it. This time we saw a kind of dip down from 52% to 45% or so, a fairly significant dip. A group of people now using HDL that are now expecting to use ESL languages, presumable System C since that one had the biggest increase in planned usage. That's actually a surprise.
You can find the full EDACafe event calendar here.
To read more news, click here.
-- Jack Horgan, EDACafe.com Contributing Editor.
Be the first to review this article