ARM Holdings plc Reports Results for the Second Quarter and Half Year Ended 30 June 2007

Where provisional assessments of the fair values of assets and liabilities acquired on acquisition are refined, adjustments to fair values are recorded as prior year adjustments to goodwill under IFRS. Under US GAAP, such revisions are recorded as amendments to goodwill in the subsequent year.

Recognition and amortisation of intangibles

The Company has taken advantage of the exemption under IFRS 1 not to apply IFRS retrospectively to business combinations occurring before 1 January 2004. This means that for business combinations occurring before this date, the previously reported UK GAAP treatment has continued to be followed. Under previous UK GAAP, intangible assets were recognised separately from goodwill only where they could be sold separately without disposing of a business of the entity. This separability criterion does not apply under either IFRS or US GAAP. Thus, a number of intangible assets which are required to be recognised separately from goodwill under both IFRS 3 and SFAS 142, were subsumed within goodwill under UK GAAP. Under both US GAAP and IFRS, such intangible assets are amortised over their useful economic lives. Except in relation to in-process research and development (see below), there is no difference in accounting policy for intangible assets recognised as a result of business combinations entered into after 1 January 2004.

In-process research and development

Under IFRS, in-process research and development projects purchased as part of a business combination may meet the criteria set out in IAS 38, "Intangible assets", for recognition as intangible assets other than goodwill and are amortised over their useful economic lives commencing when the asset is brought into use. Under US GAAP, in-process research and development is immediately written-off to the income statement. This accounting policy difference gives rise to an associated difference in deferred tax.

Valuation of consideration on business combination

Under both IFRS and US GAAP, the fair value of consideration in a business combination includes the fair value of both equity issued and any share options granted as part of that combination. Under IFRS, any equity issued is valued at the fair value as of the date of exchange, whilst under US GAAP, the equity is valued at the date the terms of the combination were agreed to and announced. For options, under US GAAP, the fair value is based upon the total number of options granted, both vested and unvested, whilst under IFRS the fair value only includes those that have vested, together with a pro-rata value for partially vested options. Furthermore, where there is contingent consideration for an acquisition, under IFRS this is recognized as part of the purchase consideration if the contingent conditions are expected to be satisfied, whilst under US GAAP it is only recognised if the conditions have actually been met, other than to the extent necessary to eliminate any potential negative goodwill under US GAAP.

Deferred compensation

Under US GAAP, the intrinsic value of unvested stock options issued by an acquirer as part of a business combination in exchange for unvested share options of the acquiree is recorded as a debit balance within shareholders' funds. This amount is charged to the profit and loss account over the vesting period of the share options in accordance with FIN 28. Under IFRS, no such adjustment to shareholders' funds is made on acquisition. Following the adoption of FAS No. 123 (revised 2004) (FAS 123(R)), "Share-based payment", the unamortised balance has been transferred to additional paid-in capital.

Compensation charge in respect of share-based payments

The Company issues equity-settled share-based payments to certain employees. In accordance with IFRS 2, equity-settled share-based payments are measured at fair value at the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, based on the Company's estimate of the number of shares that will eventually vest. Under US GAAP, the Company is required, effective as of 1 January 2006, to adopt FAS 123(R). FAS 123(R) requires the Company to expense share-based payments, including employee stock-options, based on their fair value. The Company has elected to utilize the "modified prospective" method of adoption, such that compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (i) based on the requirements of FAS 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (ii) based on the requirements of FAS 123(R) for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of FAS 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date.

Some awards made by the Company are liability-classified awards under FAS123(R) as either: (i) there is an obligation to settle a fixed monetary amount in a variable number of shares; or (ii) the award is indexed to a factor other than performance, market or service condition. The fair value of these awards is remeasured at each period end until the award has vested. Once the award has vested, or for (i) above when number of shares becomes fixed, the award becomes equity-classified.

Deferred tax on UK and US share options

In the US and the UK, the Company is entitled to a tax deduction for the amount treated as employee compensation under US and UK tax rules on exercise of certain employee share options. The compensation is equivalent to the difference between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the shares at the date of exercise.

Under IFRS, deferred tax assets are recognised and are calculated by comparing the estimated amount of tax deduction to be obtained in the future (based on the Company's share price at the balance sheet date) with the cumulative amount of the compensation expense recorded in the income statement. If the amount of estimated future tax deduction exceeds the cumulative amount of the remuneration expense at the statutory tax rate, the excess is recorded directly in equity, against the profit and loss reserve. In accordance with the transitional provisions of IFRS 2, no compensation charge is recorded in respect of options granted before 7 November 2002 or in respect of those options which have been exercised or have lapsed before 31 December 2004. Nevertheless, tax deductions have arisen and will continue to arise on these options. The tax effects arising in relation to these options are recorded directly in equity, against retained earnings.

Under US GAAP, deferred tax assets are recognised by multiplying the compensation expense recorded by the prevailing tax rate in the relevant tax jurisdiction. Where, on exercise of the relevant option, the tax benefit obtained exceeds the deferred tax asset in relation to the relevant options, the excess is recorded in additional paid-in capital. Where the tax benefit is less than the deferred tax asset, the write-down of the deferred tax asset is recorded against additional paid-in capital to the extent of previous excess tax benefits recorded in this account, with any remainder recorded in the income statement.

Employer taxes on share-based remuneration

Under IFRS, employer's taxes that are payable on the exercise or vesting of share-based remuneration are provided for over the vesting period of the related option or award. Under US GAAP, such taxes are accounted for when the option or award is exercised or vests respectively.

Accrued legal costs

Under IFRS, future legal fees that the Company is expecting to incur on current cases are accrued when the obligating event giving rise to the legal costs has occurred. Under US GAAP, such costs are charged to the income statement in the period in which the costs are incurred.

Enactment of tax rate changes

Under IFRS, when a change in statutory corporate tax rate occurs, the impact on deferred tax balances which are expected to reverse after the rate has changed is accounted for when the change has been substantially enacted. Under US GAAP, the impact is accounted for once the rate change has been fully enacted.

Sabbatical leave

The Company has adopted EITF 06-2 from 1 January 2007 in accounting for its provisions for employee sabbatical leave. To harmonize the accounting treatment under both GAAPs, the Company has also provided for sabbatical leave under IFRS. EITF 06-2 requires the opening provision at the beginning of the year to be charged directly to reserves, whilst under IFRS, the prior year results have been restated.

« Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11  Next Page »



Review Article Be the first to review this article

EMA:

Featured Video
Editorial
Peggy AycinenaWhat Would Joe Do?
by Peggy Aycinena
Retail Therapy: Jump starting Black Friday
Peggy AycinenaIP Showcase
by Peggy Aycinena
REUSE 2016: Addressing the Four Freedoms
More Editorial  
Jobs
AE-APPS SUPPORT/TMM for EDA Careers at San Jose-SOCAL-AZ, CA
FAE FIELD APPLICATIONS SAN DIEGO for EDA Careers at San Diego, CA
Manager, Field Applications Engineering for Real Intent at Sunnyvale, CA
Development Engineer-WEB SKILLS +++ for EDA Careers at North Valley, CA
Upcoming Events
Zuken Innovation World 2017, April 24 - 26, 2017, Hilton Head Marriott Resort & Spa in Hilton Head Island, SC at Hilton Head Marriott Resort & Spa Hilton Head Island NC - Apr 24 - 26, 2017
CST Webinar Series



Internet Business Systems © 2016 Internet Business Systems, Inc.
595 Millich Dr., Suite 216, Campbell, CA 95008
+1 (408)-337-6870 — Contact Us, or visit our other sites:
AECCafe - Architectural Design and Engineering TechJobsCafe - Technical Jobs and Resumes GISCafe - Geographical Information Services  MCADCafe - Mechanical Design and Engineering ShareCG - Share Computer Graphic (CG) Animation, 3D Art and 3D Models
  Privacy Policy