Open side-bar Menu
 Real Talk
Lauro Rizzatti - General Manager, EVE-USA
Lauro Rizzatti - General Manager, EVE-USA
Lauro is general manager of EVE-USA. He has more than 30 years of experience in EDA and ATE, where he held responsibilities in top management, product marketing, technical marketing and engineering.

Will 70 Remain the Verification Number?

 
June 7th, 2010 by Lauro Rizzatti - General Manager, EVE-USA

It’s that time of year again.  The design automation community is about to descend on Anaheim for the yearly conference.  The build up of anticipation, the buzz and the extra effort preparing for our booth have me pondering the topic of verification.

With verification consuming 70% of the design cycle, will 70% of the exhibitors at DAC this year offer tools to solve the verification challenge?  We will see.  While the percentage may not reach 70, I am confident that many companies will offer a variety of new, old or repackaged techniques, methodologies and tools for a verification engineer’s consumption.

With an abundance of options and choices, could the verification tool categories make up 70% of the EDA tools category?  Well, that is our space, hardware emulation, and Real Intent’s in the formal verification area.  Add acceleration, assertions, debug, prototyping, simulation, testbench generation, TLM models, validation, functional qualification, static verification and the list is growing, but not quite overtaking the rest of the field.

Next are the attendees at this hallowed event.  One can’t help but wonder if 70% of attendees are verification engineers, given the mammoth effort to verify that a chip will work as intended.  Will 70% come from the U.S. or will we see some attendees from Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, as well?  What’s more, of this group, are they spending 70% of their time on the exhibit floor researching verification solutions and new technologies?  Or, for that matter, 70% of their CAD budget on verification tools?

And, lest we forget, does verification account for 70% of the yearly EDA revenue?  Not according to the EDA Consortium.  In 2009, Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) contributions to the EDA worldwide revenues were in the ballpark of 40%, which includes IC Physical Design and Verification, PCB and MCM, Semiconductor IP Products and Tools, and Services.  Within CAE, by adding all forms of verification, such as logic, formal, timing, analog and ESL, that number exceeds 70%.

Even if you’re not a verification engineer, verification must matter as SoC design sizes and complexity continue to outwit even the most sophisticated EDA design flow.  After all, the average design size is about 10-million ASIC gates, with individual blocks running between two- and four-million ASIC gates.  And, the push to get products to market is only increasing.

As DAC kicks off next week in Anaheim, the question is whether a company on the exhibit floor will have the breakthrough verification tool to crack the 70% barrier.  Many will have software and hardware that will help to reduce the insidious verification challenges.  Emulation, for instance, is emerging as a tool for debugging hardware and for testing the integration of hardware and software within SoCs ahead of first silicon.  Stop by EVE’s booth (#510) during DAC to see a range of hardware/software co-verification solutions, including super fast emulation.  You’ll walk away with greater understanding of ways to reduce the time consumed doing verification, a handy reusable tote bag, and chances to win one of two iPADs or one $100 visa check card. Stop by Real Intent booth 722 to see how Real Intent’s solutions bridge the verification gap in Lint, CDC, SDC, DFT and X-Prop verification. They are giving away some real good looking and useful carabiner flashlights and carabiner watches.

Related posts:

One Response to “Will 70 Remain the Verification Number?”

  1. John Brennan says:

    This is a very interesting subject area, as functional verification remains one of those difficult to automate tasks. My opinion, having been involved now in the functional verification space for 10 years now at Cadence, is that 70 will remain and even grow. But lets break this down a bit more – first the good news: there has been quite a bit done to standardize and automate the verification process. Think of how far we have come just in the verification methodology side with advances such as OVM, and now UVM. We have all learned how to properly apply coverage as a key metric of verification completeness, and we can measure in a meaningful way how much verification we have done with metric driven verification techniques. So what is the bad news you ask? Things like accelerating metric driven verification using the same techniques and methdology are at their infancy, yet emerging as key to verification productivity. Finding the root cause of a bug, and automating the way you debug once you find a bug are still very length process’s. Extending the notion of metric driven verification to other domains, such as ESL, embedded software, and analog-mixed signal should be a key productivity boost for users this year. This alone may begin to drive the revenue more in line with the size of the problem. Cadence is driving these kind of solutions now, come see for yourself next week at DAC – but adoption takes time, and only then will 70 take on a whole new meaning. #CDNS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

DownStream: Solutions for Post Processing PCB Designs
Verific: SystemVerilog & VHDL Parsers
TrueCircuits: UltraPLL



Internet Business Systems © 2016 Internet Business Systems, Inc.
595 Millich Dr., Suite 216, Campbell, CA 95008
+1 (408)-337-6870 — Contact Us, or visit our other sites:
TechJobsCafe - Technical Jobs and Resumes EDACafe - Electronic Design Automation GISCafe - Geographical Information Services  MCADCafe - Mechanical Design and Engineering ShareCG - Share Computer Graphic (CG) Animation, 3D Art and 3D Models
  Privacy Policy